MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891670761 · doi:10.14740/jocmr3581w

Dysfunction and Therapeutic Potential of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Diabetes Mellitus

2018· review· en· W2891670761 on OpenAlexaffvenue
HU Li-dong, Si-Cheng Dai, Xiaojun Luan, Jingsong Chen, Anthony Cannavicci

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgenitor cellMedicineCD34AngiogenesisBone marrowPeripheral blood mononuclear cellEndothelial progenitor cellEndothelial stem cellHaematopoiesisMyeloidStem cellImmunologyTransplantationEndothelial dysfunctionCancer researchInternal medicineBiologyCell biologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic, multifactorial metabolic disease whereby insulin deficiency or resistance results in hyperglycemia. Endothelial cells (ECs) form the innermost layer of the blood vessel and produce and release a variety of vasoactive substances and growth factors to regulate vascular homeostasis and angiogenesis. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance can cause endothelial dysfunction, leading to vascular complications such as coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy. The detrimental effect exerted on ECs by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance underlines the importance of reparatory mechanisms in DM. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), derived from bone marrow, have been recognized as endogenous cells involved in endothelial repair and new blood vessel formation. Initially isolated from a subset of circulating CD34+ mononuclear cells, EPCs were found to possess the ability to differentiate into ECs when cultured in vitro and incorporate into newly formed vessels upon transplantation in animal models of ischemia. Due to the low frequency of CD34+ cells in circulation, the vast majority of studies investigating EPC actions have used cells that are generated through the culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) for 4 - 7 days in endothelial selective medium. These cells, mainly of myeloid hematopoietic cell origin, were termed “Early EPCs ”, of which, few expressed stem/progenitor-cell markers. Therefore, early EPCs were also termed “myeloid angiogenic cells” (MACs). When PBMNCs are cultured for over 2 weeks, early EPCs gradually diminish while so-called late EPCs appear. Late EPCs share phenotypic features with mature ECs and are therefore also termed blood-derived ECs; they will not be addressed in this review. MAC dysfunction has been observed in a variety of disease conditions including DM. In this article we review the activities and therapeutic potential of MACs in DM. We will interchangeably use “EPCs” and “MACs” to refer to the cells procured by culture of PBMNCs in EC selective medium for approximately 7 days. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(10):752-757 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3581w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207