The Stoichiometry of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen in Peat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O) form ~90% by mass of peat, a product of the input of plant tissues and litter and the output of decomposition under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. We examined patterns of these elements, as the O:C and H:C atomic ratios, in over 1,300 peat samples collected from over 400 profiles in Ontario, Canada, representing bogs, fens, and swamps. The overall O:C ratio decreased from the surface (0.6 to 0.7) to ~0.5 at a depth of 50 cm and showed little further change to a depth of 5 m. In contrast, the H:C ratio decreased only slightly (1.30 to 1.25) over the top 1 m and showed no further significant decline with depth. The C oxidative state (C ox ) and oxidation ratio showed strong decreases and increases, respectively, with depth with most changes occurring in the top 0.5 m. The O:C ratio, and C ox and oxidation ratio values were significantly correlated with the von Post humification index, with most changes occurring in index values 1 through 4, the latter representing a slight degree of decomposition. Collation of the Ontario peats with other data sets revealed the very large range in O:C and H:C values, with a general decrease from temperate to tropical and subtropical peatlands. Estimation of the O:C and H:C ratios of input (litter) and output (mineralization to CO 2 , methanogenesis to CH 4 and CO 2 , and loss as dissolved organic C) allowed an estimation of the degree of decomposition or C loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".