Interference and Outage Analysis of Random D2D Networks Underlaying Millimeter-Wave Cellular Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Device-to-device (D2D) networks underlaying a millimeter-wave cellular network have great potential for capacity growth. Thus, it is important to characterize the outage of such a D2D link incorporating millimeter-wave propagation effects, user association rules, power control, and spatial randomness. To this end, we model the locations of cellular transmitters and receivers as homogeneous Poisson point processes and those of the D2D nodes as a Matérn cluster process, and incorporate blockages due to random objects, sectored antenna patterns, log-distance path loss, and Nakagami-m fading. Furthermore, we consider antenna gain inversion-based power control, and peak power constraints for D2D devices along with distinct path loss exponents and distinct fading severities for line-of-sight (LOS) and non-LOS scenarios. With the aid of stochastic geometry tools, we derive closed-form expressions of the moment generating function of the aggregate interference on a D2D receiver node and its outage probability for two transmitter-receiver association schemes- nearest association and LOS association. We finally show that the feasibility of millimeter-wave D2D communication relies heavily on the D2D cluster radii, peak power thresholds, and node densities. Furthermore, these parameters affect the performance of the desired link more than the interference and noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it