MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891778372 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.180060

Complement C5-blocking Agent in Refractory Dermatomyositis

2018· letter· en· W2891778372 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stanislas Faguer, Julie Bellière, David Ribes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRituximabEculizumabDermatomyositisThrombotic microangiopathyInternal medicineDermatologyAzathioprineGastroenterologySurgeryAntibodyImmunologyLymphomaDiseaseComplement system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare autoimmune disease that belongs to the group of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The usual treatment of DM was based on steroids, methotrexate, and azathioprine. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab (RTX), or other biological treatments recently emerged as steroid-sparing agents1. About 10% to 30% of patients will develop a refractory or chronic persistent disease2, suggesting that alternative treatments should be tested. Here, we report a case of acute refractory DM with concomitant thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) that improved with the C5-blocking agent eculizumab in the setting of other medications. According to the French law regarding observational retrospective studies (Jardé Law, 2016), written informed consent to publish the material was obtained from the patient, but approval by a specific ethics board was waived. A 19-year-old female patient, without medical history or medications, developed moderate arm and limb muscle weakness, Raynaud phenomenon, Gottron papules, mechanic’s hand, and edema of limb, arm, and periorbital regions. One month later, she was admitted to the hospital for severe acrocyanosis (Figure 1A–B), and examination showed elevated muscle enzymes [creatine … Address correspondence to Professor S. Faguer, Département de Néphrologie et Transplantation d’organes, INSERM U1048 (équipe 12, I2MC), Hôpital Rangueil 1, Avenue Jean Poulhes, 31000 Toulouse, France. E-mail: faguer.s{at}chu-toulouse.fr

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicInflammatory Myopathies and DermatomyositisFrench-language works237,207