Relationship of apathy in geriatric depression with depressive symptom severity and cognitive functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Apathy which is known as loss of primary motivation is observed more frequently in elderly depression in comparison with younger adults. It is put forth that apathy is related with depressive symptom severity and cognitive functions, that the existence of apathy may be a predictor of neurocognitive impairment. The objective of this study was to examine the apathy levels in elderly patients with major depression as well as the relationship between depressive symptom severity and cognitive functions. METHODS: The study was carried out with 40 major depressive disorder patients (MDD) aged 60 and above, 40 healthy controls aged 60 and above. Sociodemographic data form, structured psychiatric interview (SCID-I), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Standardized Mini Mental State Examination (SMMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were applied to the participants. RESULTS: In our study, HAM-D, HAM-A and MADRS scale scores of MDD group was determined to be higher in comparison with those of the healthy control group. A positive correlation was determined in the MDD groups between the AES scores and depressive symptom severity, whereas a negative correlation was determined between the AES scores and cognitive functions. The SMMSE and MoCA scores of the geriatric MDD group were determined to be lower in comparison with healthy control group. Low performance was observed in the geriatric MDD group especially in the fields of orientation, visual/spatial functions, memory and language. Functionality was found to be lower in MDB group than in the control group, and functionality decreased as the level of apathy increased. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the apathy levels in geriatric depression are higher in comparison with the control group. Cognitive functions are affected adversely in geriatric patients in major depressive disorder, depressive symptom severity, impairment in cognitive functions and functionality are observed to be related with apathy level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".