MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) among non-irradiated survivors of childhood cancer treated with chemotherapy in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

2018· article· en· W2891803428 on OpenAlexaff
Lucie M. Turcotte, Qi Liu, Yutaka Yasui, Tara O. Henderson, Todd M. Gibson, Wendy M. Leisenring, Michael Arnold, Rebecca M. Howell, Daniel M. Green, Gregory T. Armstrong, Leslie L. Robison, Joseph Philip Neglia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCumulative incidenceInternal medicineOncologyAnthracyclinePopulationCancerIncidence (geometry)ChemotherapyCumulative doseCohortBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10509 Background: In recent treatment eras radiotherapy (RT) use decreased while chemotherapy (CT) increased. RT is an established risk factor for SMNs. Limited data exist on how CT increases risk for SMNs > 5 years after childhood cancer. Methods: SMNs were evaluated in 5-year survivors diagnosed < 21 years of age between 1970-99, treated with CT and not RT (N = 7447, 138,008 person-years follow-up). 30-year cumulative incidence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for SMNs were estimated. SIRs were estimated for chemotherapy exposures [alkylator: 0, 1-3999, 4000-7999, ≥8000 mg/m2; platinum: 0, 1-400, 401-750, > 750 mg/m2; anthracycline: 0, 1-100, 101-300, > 300 mg/m2; epipodophyllotoxin: 0, 1-1000, 1001-4000, > 4000 mg/m2]. Results: There were 154 SMNs among 139 survivors. Cumulative incidence for SMNs at 30 years was 4.5% (95% CI 3.4-5.6) and risk for SMN was 3-fold greater than the general population. Survivors of leukemia, lymphoma, and sarcomas had increased risk for SMNs (Table), whereas, survivors of Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma and CNS cancer did not. Exposure to moderate- to high-dose alkylator (≥4000 mg/m2) or platinum ( > 400 mg/m2) or high-dose anthracycline ( > 300 mg/m2) or epiodophyllotoxin ( > 4000 mg/m2) therapy had SIRs of ≥4.0. A combination of alkylators and platinum, one of the two being high-dose and the other being moderate or high-dose, had a SIR of 13.0 (95% CI 6.5-23.2). Conclusions: Non-RT exposed survivors are at increased risk for SMN and should be counseled regarding the potential for genetic predisposition and the need for increased surveillance for early detection of subsequent cancers. SIRs (95% CI) for SMNs by childhood cancer diagnosis. Primary Cancer SMN All SMNs (n = 154) Leukemia/ Lymphoma (n = 21) Breast (n = 34) Soft tissue sarcoma (n = 14) Thyroid (n = 20) Melanoma (n = 15) All diagnoses 3.1 (2.6-3.6) 2.9 (2.4-3.4) 6.3 (4.4-8.9) 4.1 (2.2-6.8) 3.5 (2.2-5.5) 3.4 (2.1-5.3) Leukemia/lymphoma (n = 4309) 2.7 (2.2-3.4) 2.1 (1.2-3.4) 6.3 (3.7-10.1) 1.5 (0.3-4.3) 2.6 (1.2-5.0) 4.1 (2.3-6.9) Sarcoma (n = 1484) 3.8 (3.0-4.9) 2.5 (1.0-5.1) 7.1 (4.1-11.3) 10.0 (4.8-18.4) 5.6 (2.6-10.7) 3.2 (1.2-7.0)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→