MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891834094 · doi:10.2147/dddt.s174928

The effect of food and liquid pH on the integrity of enteric-coated beads from cysteamine bitartrate delayed-release capsules

2018· article· en· W2891834094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Design Development and Therapy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHorizon PharmaAmerican Pharmacists Association
KeywordsCysteamineEnteric coatedChemistryPharmacologyChromatographyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: ) is approved for treatment of nephropathic cystinosis in the USA, Canada, and the EU. The capsules contain cysteamine bitartrate beads that are enteric coated with acid-resistant Eudragit L 30 D-55, preventing drug release in the acidic stomach environment while allowing dissolution of the beads in the more alkaline environment of the small intestine. Patients who have difficulty swallowing capsules can open capsules, sprinkle beads onto 4 ounces of a suitable food or liquid, gently mix, and consume the entire content within 30 minutes. Foods found to be suitable for administration, and described in the Procysbi US labeling, include fruit juices (except grapefruit juice), applesauce, and berry jelly; there are minor variations in the foods and liquids recommended by regulatory authorities in other countries. This study aimed to assess the stability of enteric-coated beads exposed to additional foods at different conditions to expand the list of suitable foods for drug administration. METHODS: For each test condition, beads from eight opened 75 mg cysteamine bitartrate DR capsules were gently mixed with test food and maintained at a prespecified temperature and duration; remaining undissolved beads were then recovered from the food. The recovered beads were split into two portions: one assayed for remaining drug content and the other subjected to dissolution testing to assess the effect on the drug-release profile. RESULTS: The results show that bead integrity was maintained when mixed with foods at pH values <5.5 at all time points when refrigerated (2°C-8°C) and at room (20°C-22°C) and lukewarm (37°C-41°C) temperatures. Bead integrity was not maintained when mixed with foods at pH values of ≥5.5 at room temperature. CONCLUSION: The results from this in vitro dissolution study help in identifying additional foods that may be used for the administration of cysteamine bitartrate DR beads from opened capsules using the sprinkle method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it