Field study on SS discharge from combined sewer system of highly urbanized area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the sewage coverage rate in tokyo ward has reached 100%, however, 80% of this coverage is combined sewer systems that were built before 1980.consequently, large quantities of organic pollutants are discharged from the rainwater outlets into rivers during heavy rainfalls.the organic pollutants accumulate in downstream brackish-water regions, and water quality problems such as floating scum, foul odors, and cloudy water arise as a result of chemical changes associated with bottom water becoming anaerobic.in this study, the suspended solid (ss) runoff characteristics were investigated in the nomi river drainage basin in which a combined sewer system handles 100%.the overflow water depth and ss were measured at the weir in one rainwater outlet during two storm events, and the parameters for miKe urban software that calculates sewer runoff were adjusted in the ranges recommended by the manual so that the observation results could be reproduced well.next, the model was applied to the 38 outlets in the entire catchment of the nomi river, and the estimated discharges were input into a one-dimensional unsteady river flow model.observational results of water level and turbidity measurements within the river channel were satisfactorily reproduced by the calculation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".