MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891876994 · doi:10.22060/ajce.2017.12387.5203

Effect of Nano Rice Husk Ash Against Penetration of Chloride Ions in Mortars

2018· article· en· W2891876994 on OpenAlexaff
A.A. Ramezanianpour, Mohammad Balapour, Erfan Hajibandeh

Bibliographic record

VenueAUT Journal of Civil Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDurabilityPozzolanCompressive strengthHuskMaterials scienceMortarCarbonationComposite materialCementAbsorption of waterNano-Serviceability (structure)ChlorideMetakaolinPortland cementMetallurgyStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These days, in the structural designing, the durability properties of materials should be considered as significant as the other specifications. Deterioration of concretes in corrosive environments leads to considerable costs in order to maintain the reinforced concrete structures. Usage of industrial pozzolans can improve quality and serviceability of concrete structures in such environments. Nowadays, one of the most common pozzolans in structural concretes is the rice husk ash (RHA) which enhances the mechanical and durability properties of concretes. In this paper, effects of nano RHA on chloride permeability, compressive strength, electrical resistivity and capillary absorption of mortars have been investigated. The results showed that the incorporation of RHA nanoparticles gradually increased the compressive strength. It was found that a partial replacement of cement by nano RHA would enhance the durability properties of mortars in the long-term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAUT Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207