MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A multicenter, open-label, phase II study of PGG beta-glucan and pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) following progression on treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) failing front-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

2017· article· en· W2892185075 on OpenAlexaff
J. L. Mesías Iglesias, Radha Prathikanti, Bo Ma, Paulette Mattson, Deb Kedrowski, Jamie Lowe, Nandita Bose, Katie Ertelt, Nadine Ottoson, Mark Uhlik, Jeremy R. Graff, Richard D. Huhn, Michael Chisamore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsApotex (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabOncologyInternal medicineTriple-negative breast cancerImmunotherapyPhases of clinical researchAntigenImmune systemNeutropeniaMetastatic breast cancerCancerBreast cancerClinical trialImmunologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS3105 Background: Imprime PGG (Imprime) is a Pathogen- Associated Molecular Pattern that enhances innate immune cell killing, counteracts immune suppression and triggers activation and maturation of antigen presenting cells. Imprime’s ability to trigger a coordinated innate and adaptive immune response is critical for enhancing the efficacy of CPIs in several pre-clinical tumor models. We are now exploring the combination of PGG beta-glucan and Pembrolizumab, a humanized mAb against programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) in the clinic. In previous trials, Pembro yielded a 33% ORR and 23 mo mOS in 655 pts with advanced MEL and an 18.5% ORR and 11.2 mo mOS in 27 evaluable pts with metastatic/recurrent TNBC (Ribas et al., 2016; Nanda et al., 2016). Pre-treatment levels of anti-beta glucan antibodies (ABA) are correlated with pt response to Imprime. Methods: This Phase 2 study is enrolling ABA positive pts with advanced MEL following progression on treatment with a CPI or metastatic TNBC failing front-line chemotherapy. The study is a Simon optimal 2-stage design with sample size of 12 pts of each tumor type in Stage 1. If response and AE criteria (≤ 4 [or ≤ 33%] pts with grade 3/4 in Cycle 1) for each tumor type are met, an additional 17 pts with MEL and 30 pts with TNBC will be enrolled in Stage 2. Primary endpoints of the study are ORR (based on RECIST 1.1) and safety. Secondary endpoints include TTR, CRR, DoR, PFS, and OS. PK data will be profiled. Exploratory endpoints include ORR and PFS based on irRECIST, analysis of an ABA biomarker, immune cell activation markers, and changes in the tumor immune microenvironment. Screening and enrollment are underway in the US. Biothera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is sponsoring the trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02981303) under a collaborative agreement with Merck. Clinical trial information: NCT02981303.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.496
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207