Momentum Model-Based Minimal Parameter Identification of a Space Robot
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate information of inertial parameters is critical to motion planning and control of space robots. Before the launch, only a rudimentary estimate of the inertial parameters is available from experiments and CAD models. After the launch, on-orbit operations substantially alter the value of inertial parameters. In this work, a new momentum model-based method is proposed for identifying the minimal parameters of a space robot while on orbit. Minimal parameters are combinations of the inertial parameters of the links and uniquely define the momentum and dynamic models. Consequently, they are sufficient for motion planning and control of both the satellite and robotic arms mounted on it. The key to the proposed framework is the unique formulation of the momentum model in the linear form of minimal parameters. Further, to estimate the minimal parameters, a novel joint trajectory planning and optimization technique based on direction combinations of joints’ velocity are proposed. The efficacy of the identification framework is demonstrated on a 12-degree-of-freedom, spatial, dual-arm space robot. The methodology is developed for tree-type space robots, requires just the pose and twist data, and is scalable with increasing number of joints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".