Robotic Intracellular Manipulation: 3D Navigation and Measurement Inside a Single Cell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magnetic micromanipulation is an untethered technique and has enabled numerous applications in the scale of millimeters to micrometers from the tissue level to cell level. However, existing systems are not capable of maneuvering a sub-micrometer object for precise force control, preventing the realization of intracellular manipulation or `fantastic voyage' inside a single cell. The magnetic micromanipulation task achieved in this work is sub-micrometer position control and piconewton force control of a sub-micron (0.7 μm) magnetic bead inside a single human bladder cancer cell (RT4). The magnetic bead was 3D positioned in the cell using a generalized predictive controller that effectively tackled the control challenge caused by the slow visual feedback (1 Hz) from high-resolution confocal microscopy. The average positioning error was quantified to be 0.43 μm, which is slightly larger than Brownian motion-imposed constraint (0.31 μm). The system is capable of three-dimensionally applying a maximum force of 60 pN with a resolution of 4 pN. In experiments, a 0.7 μm magnetic bead was controlled to move from an initial position in a cell to target positions on the cell nucleus. Force-displacement data were obtained from multiple locations along the cell nucleus' major and minor axes. The results revealed, for the first time, significantly higher stiffness exists in the cell nucleus' major axis than the minor axis. This stiffness polarity was likely attributed to the aligned stress fibers of actin filament inside the cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".