MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single agent activity of ZW25, a HER2-targeted bispecific antibody, in heavily pretreated HER2-expressing cancers.

2018· article· en· W2892311857 on OpenAlexaff
Funda Meric‐Bernstam, M. Beeram, José Mayordomo, Diana L. Hanna, Jaffer A. Ajani, Mariela A. Blum Murphy, Rashmi K. Murthy, Sarina A. Piha‐Paul, Todd M. Bauer, Johanna C. Bendell, Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, Heinz‐Josef Lenz, Michael F. Press, Nels Royer, Diana F. Hausman, Erika Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsZymeworks (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePertuzumabLapatinibTrastuzumabInternal medicineOncologyAdverse effectCancerBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2500 Background: ZW25, a novel Azymetric bispecific antibody, targets HER2 domains ECD2 and ECD4, resulting in multiple differentiated mechanisms of action including increased tumor cell binding, blockade of ligand-dependent and independent growth, and improved receptor internalization and downregulation relative to trastuzumab (T). In vivo studies demonstrate anti-tumor activity in HER2-low to high expressing models. This Phase 1 study evaluated ZW25 single agent safety and anti-tumor activity. Methods: Part 1 (P1) evaluated ZW25 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg weekly and 20 mg/kg biweekly using a 3+3 design to identify a recommended dose (RD) for further study. Part 2 (P2) is ongoing and evaluating safety and efficacy in separate expansion cohorts, including HER2-high (IHC 3+ or 2+/FISH+) breast (BC), gastric/esophageal (GE), and other cancers. Pts had to have progressive disease after standard of care, including HER2-targeted agents. Adverse events (AE), PK, and response per RECIST 1.1 (every 8 wks in pts with measurable disease) were assessed. Results: 33 pts have been treated in P1 and P2: 17 BC, 11 GE and 5 other cancers. HER2-high BC pts had prior T and T-DM1 (100%), pertuzumab (82%) and lapatinib (53%), with a median of 6 HER2-targeted regimens for metastatic disease. All GE pts had received prior T, with a median of 4 systemic tx. Safety and anti-tumor activity were similar across dose levels with no DLTs. The RD for Part 2 was 10 mg/kg weekly or 20 mg/kg biweekly. The most common AEs were diarrhea and infusion reaction, all Gr 1 or 2, with no tx-related discontinuations. Time on study is 14-348 days with 9 pts still active. 23 pts are response evaluable, with 3 pts not yet restaged. Conclusions: ZW25 has been well tolerated with promising single agent anti-tumor activity in pts with heavily pretreated HER2-expressing cancers that have progressed after standard of care, including multiple HER2-targeted regimens. These data support the therapeutic potential of ZW25 and suggest that its unique MOA may overcome mechanisms of resistance to other HER2-targeted agents. Clinical trial information: NCT02892123.Partial response (PR) and disease control rates DCR = PR or SD anytime on study. PR DCR BC n=13 46% 54% GE n=7 43% 57% Other n=3 — 33% Total n=23 39% 52%

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.558
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207