MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Age-associated vulnerability to treatment-related late cardiotoxicity: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

2017· article· en· W2892361194 on OpenAlexaff
James E. Bates, Qi Liu, Yutaka Yasui, Rebecca M. Howell, Daniel A. Mulrooney, Sughosh Dhakal, Wendy M. Leisenring, Daniel J. Indelicato, Todd M. Gibson, Gregory T. Armstrong, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Louis S. Constine

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCoronary artery diseaseCardiotoxicityInternal medicineCancerRelative riskPopulationIncidence (geometry)Cumulative incidenceConfidence intervalCohortToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10501 Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common non-cancer cause of death in long-term survivors of pediatric cancer. We investigated the role of age at diagnosis in modifying treatment-related late CVD risk in the CCSS population. Methods: We evaluated CTCAE grade 3 – 5 CVD events occurring ≥5 years after diagnosis in 23,465 5-year survivors of pediatric cancer diagnosed 1970-1999. We estimated the rates of developing any CVD, including coronary artery disease (CAD) or heart failure (HF). Modifications of treatment effects by age at diagnosis were analyzed using piecewise exponential models adjusting for current age, race, and smoking. Results: At a median age of 28.4 years (range 5.6 –58.3) and follow up of 20.2 years (5 – 39.3), 239 CAD and 359 HF events occurred. The cumulative incidence of CVD, CAD, and HF were 4.8% (95% CI: 4.3-5.3), 2.4% (95% CI: 2.2-2.9), and 2.5% (95% CI: 2.2-2.9) by 30 years from diagnosis. Mean cardiac radiotherapy (CRT) doses of ≥10 Gy were associated with a progressively increasing risk of CVD (10 - < 20 Gy: RR 3.6, 95% CI 2.1 – 6.2, p < 0.01; 20 - < 30 Gy: RR 4.4, 95% CI 2.7 – 7.2, p < 0.01; ≥30 Gy: RR 7.5, 95% CI 4.9 – 11.5, p < 0.01) relative to those receiving no CRT. In those receiving a low mean CRT dose (0.1 - < 10 Gy), younger children had higher rates of CVD (0 – 4 years: RR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.0 – 4.6, p = 0.04; > 4 - ≤13 years: RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1 – 4.1, p = 0.03) compared to those > 13 years, an effect not seen at higher doses. Among survivors exposed to anthracycline doses ≥250 mg/m2, those age 0 – 4 at diagnosis had increased risk of both CAD (RR = 4.9, 95% CI 1.5 – 16.3, p = 0.01) and HF (RR = 3.0, 95% CI 1.6 – 5.0, p < 0.01). Cisplatin exposure ≥300 mg/m2 was associated with increased risk of any CVD (RR = 1.8, CI = 1.2 – 2.6, p < 0.01), primarily attributable to increased risk of HF (RR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.5 - 3.5, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Among long-term survivors of pediatric cancer, increasing CRT dose is associated with increased risk for CVD in a dose-response relationship. Young children are at higher risk for CVD after low-dose CRT or high-dose anthracycline exposure. Cisplatin exposure significantly increases risk for CVD. These findings should inform future treatment and surveillance protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationFrench-language works237,207