MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892444979 · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2897-8

Antenatal sildenafil administration to prevent pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (SToP-PH): study protocol for a phase I/IIb placenta transfer and safety study

2018· article· en· W2892444979 on OpenAlexaff
Francesca Maria Russo, Alexandra Benachi, Tim Van Mieghem, Jan de Hoon, Kristel Van Calsteren, Pieter Annaert, Jean‐Marc Tréluyer, Karel Allegaert, Jan Deprest

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU LeuvenKU Leuven
KeywordsMedicineSildenafilCongenital diaphragmatic herniaPulmonary hypertensionTransplacentalPregnancyObstetricsFetusPlacentaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is an orphan disease with high neonatal mortality and significant morbidity. An important cause for this is pulmonary hypertension, for which no effective postnatal therapy is available to date. An innovative strategy aiming at treating or preventing pulmonary hypertension more effectively is urgently needed. Prenatal sildenafil administration to expectant mothers prevented fetal and neonatal vascular changes leading to pulmonary hypertension in several animal models, and is, therefore, a promising approach. Before transferring this antenatal medical approach to the clinic, more information is needed on transplacental transfer and safety of sildenafil in humans. METHODS: This is a randomized, investigator-blinded, double-armed, parallel-group, phase I/IIb study with as a primary objective to measure the in-vivo transplacental transfer of sildenafil in women in the second and early third trimester of pregnancy (sub-study 1; weeks: 20.0-32.6) and at term (sub-study 2; weeks: 36.6-40). Participants will be randomized to two different sildenafil doses: 25 or 75 mg. In sub-study 1, a single dose of the investigational product will be administered to women undergoing termination of pregnancy, and maternal and fetal blood samples will be collected for determination of sildenafil concentrations. In sub-study 2, sildenafil will be administered three times daily from 3 days before planned delivery until actual delivery, following which maternal and umbilical cord samples will be collected. Proxies of maternal and fetal tolerance as well as markers of fetal pulmonary vasodilation will also be measured. DISCUSSION: This is the first study evaluating in-vivo transplacental passage of sildenafil in humans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register 2016-002619-17, validated on 12 August 2016. Trial sponsor: UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207