Posture Recognition Using an RGB-D Camera: Exploring 3D Body Modeling and Deep Learning Approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of RGB-D sensors offered new possibilities for addressing complex artificial vision problems efficiently. Human posture recognition is among these computer vision problems, with a wide range of applications such as ambient assisted living and intelligent health care systems. In this context, our paper presents novel methods and ideas to design automatic posture recognition systems using an RGB-D camera. More specifically, we introduce two supervised methods to learn and recognize human postures using the main types of visual data provided by an RGB-D camera. The first method is based on convolutional features extracted from 2D images. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are trained to recognize human postures using transfer learning on RGB and depth images. Secondly, we propose to model the posture using the body joint configuration in the 3D space. Posture recognition is then performed through SVM classification of 3D skeleton-based features. To evaluate the proposed methods, we created a challenging posture recognition dataset with a considerable variability regarding the acquisition conditions. The experimental results demonstrated comparable performances and high precision for both methods in recognizing human postures, with a slight superiority for the CNN-based method when applied on depth images. Moreover, the two approaches demonstrated a high robustness to several perturbation factors, such as scale and orientation change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".