MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892556979 · doi:10.5380/his.v66i1.57402

LA RECHERCHE ARCHÉOLOGIQUE AU QUÉBEC. QUELLE PLACE AU SOLEIL ?

2018· article· pt· W2892556979 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pierre Desrosiers

Bibliographic record

VenueHistória Questões & Debates · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O Quebec, assim como todas as províncias canadenses, legislou sobre a proteção do patrimônio arqueológico. Em consequência, a pesquisa também ficou enquadrada por esta lei. Neste contexto, de que forma a pesquisa e a prática atual da arqueologia se harmonizam? Até onde a legislação permite desenvolver a pesquisa arqueológica para que o cidadão possa beneficiar-se do conhecimento resultante das pesquisas? Este texto apresenta um panorama dos diferentes atores associados à pesquisa arqueológica no Quebec e faz constatações alarmantes sobre a produção de conhecimento. A pesquisa está realmente relegada para o segundo plano, após a proteção do patrimônio arqueológico. Não obstante, a finalidade da proteção permaneça até hoje ambígua.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistória Questões & DebatesSame topicAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryFrench-language works237,207