Cell Identity, Proliferation, and Cytogenetic Assessment of Equine Umbilical Cord Blood Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present work was to determine proliferation capacity, immunophenotype and genome integrity of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) from horse umbilical cord blood (UCB) at passage stage 5 and 10. Passage 4 cryopreserved UCB-MSCs from six unrelated donors were evaluated. Immunophenotypic analysis of UCB-MSC revealed a cell identity consistent with equine MSC phenotype by high expression of CD90, CD44, CD29, and very low expression of CD4, CD11a/18, CD73, and MHC class I and II antigens. Proliferative differences were noted among the UCB-MSC cultures. UCB-MSCs karyotype characteristics at passage 5 (eg, 2n = 64; XY, or XX) included 20% polyploidy and 62% aneuploidy. At passage 10, the proportion of polyploidy and aneuploidy was 21% and 82%, respectively, with the increase in aneuploidy being significant compared with passage 5. Furthermore, conventional GTG-banded karyotyping revealed several structural chromosome abnormalities at both passage 5 and 10. The clinical relevance of such chromosome instability is unknown, but determination of MSC cytogenetic status and monitoring of patient response to MSC therapies would help address this question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".