MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2892856921 · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2018.09.029

Perturbation theory based solution of the pitch-angle dependent cosmic ray diffusion equation

2018· article· en· W2892856921 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Shalchi, Michael Gammon

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Space Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFokker–Planck equationPhysicsPitch angleCosmic rayEigenvalues and eigenvectorsEigenfunctionPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Diffusion equationConvection–diffusion equationCOSMIC cancer databasePerturbation (astronomy)Classical mechanicsStatistical physicsDifferential equationAstrophysicsMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The motion of cosmic rays and energetic particles in general is described via transport equations. If a pitch-angle dependent description is desired, a Fokker-Planck equation provides the basis for exploring the particle motion. To date, no exact and pure analytical solution to the two-dimensional cosmic ray Fokker-Planck equation has been found. Previous attempts are either solutions of the pitch-angle averaged equation or the space integrated equation. Of course, numerical calculations can easily be performed but those are not very useful in astrophysical applications. In the current paper we employ perturbation theory in order to solve the cosmic ray Fokker-Planck equation. Corrections up to fourth-order to the eigenvalues and second-order eigenfunctions are computed. Our results are compared with previous solutions. Furthermore, we discuss applications such as estimating higher order correlations occurring in analytical treatments of perpendicular transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Space ResearchSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207