Transfusion‐associated graft‐versus‐host disease reexamined: potential for improved prevention using a universally applied intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD) is a rare, often fatal complication of blood transfusion that can occur in immunocompromised or immunocompetent recipients and is the result of viable T cells present in the blood components transfused. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the TA-GVHD clinical case literature including numerous original clinical case reports and several comprehensive case series. We also evaluated recent in vitro experimental data on the inhibition of T cell proliferation, comparing the effect of a specific pathogen inactivation (PI) technology to that of the Food and Drug Administration-recommended gamma irradiation dose of 2500 cGy. RESULTS: We identified 12 published TA-GVHD cases with atypical/milder or delayed symptom presentations and/or an atypical clinical course; these included cases attributed to leukoreduced or suboptimally irradiated units. We summarize recent in vitro data using a sensitive limiting dilution assay that establish that, compared to irradiation at the recommended 2500 cGy dose, PI using amotosalen/ultraviolet A, or amustaline/glutathione achieves a greater degree of inhibition of T cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: We propose that TA-GVHD has a spectrum of disease severity indicating that additional mild cases may still occur but be undiagnosed and/or underreported, opening up the possibility, supported by in vitro experimental data, that irradiation at the currently established dose may not be fully protective. Furthermore, since many US institutions use component irradiation selectively only for immunocompromised patients, immunocompetent recipients are not fully protected. PI technologies appear to be at least equal to, if not better than, gamma irradiation in abrogating the ability of T cells to proliferate, and if applied to all blood components, protection against TA-GVHD would be an additional benefit that would allow for the elimination of component irradiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".