MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893162805 · doi:10.2134/agronj2017.12.0751

An Agro‐Environmental Phosphorus Model for Potato in the Canadian Maritime Provinces

2018· article· en· W2893162805 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rim Benjannet, Judith Nyiraneza, Lotfi Khiari, Keith Fuller, Benoît Bizimungu, Daniel Savoie, Yefang Jiang, V. Rodd, Aaron Mills

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsGovernment of New BrunswickHealth PEIAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphorusNutrientCropSolanum tuberosumNova scotiaEnvironmental scienceSoil fertilityAgronomyYield (engineering)BiologyGeographySoil waterEcologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas Data from 42 field trials were used to develop an agro‐environmental P model for potato based on soil P saturation index. A critical agronomic PSI (P/Al) M3 of 10% was identified, which corresponded to 85% of relative yield. Seven agro‐environmental P risk classes were identified with rates ranging from 21 to 105 kg P ha −1 . Phosphorus is essential for potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.), an economically important crop for the Canadian Maritime provinces. Nutrient loss, including P, into waterways and estuaries has contributed to reduced water quality such as algae blooms. The objective of this study was to develop an agro‐environmental model for potato based on the phosphorus saturation indicator (PSI) expressed as the ratio between Mehlich‐III extractable P and Al (P/Al) M3 . A total of 42 field trials (6 conducted from 2000 to 2002 and 36 from 2013 to 2015) were conducted in Prince Edward Island (PEI), New Brunswick (NB), and Nova Scotia (NS) with six increasing P rates. A critical agronomic PSI of 10% was identified, which corresponded to 85% of relative yield. The P recommendation model was subdivided into seven P fertility and environmental risk classes with P rates ranging from 21 to 105 kg P ha −1 , i.e., on average from one to five times the level of P removal by the potato crop, corresponding to the highest ([P/Al] M3 ≥ 14) and lowest ([P/Al] M3 ≤ 2.5) PSI levels, respectively. Only one site was in the very low fertility class. Additional trials are needed within this class to build a more robust and representative model. This is the first agro‐environmental P model for sustainable potato production that reduces the risk of P loss to watercourses in the region. The new P rates were developed at plot scale and need to be validated at larger scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomy JournalSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207