Implementation of a Fully Automated Real-Time Torque and Drag Model for Improving Drilling Performance: Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The drilling industry has made significant progress on physics-based torque and drag (T&D) models that can run either offline (pre-job or post-job) or in real-time. Despite its numerous benefits, real-time T&D analysis is not prevalent since it requires merging real-time and contextual data of dissimilar frequency and quality, along with repeated calibration whose results are not easily accessible to the user. Our goal is to implement a rig-based T&D advisory system which overcomes these obstacles. The first step towards real-time T&D analysis is a reliable data acquisition and processing system at the rig site. This includes the ability to receive and process data of different frequency and merge it with contextual data. Once this was accomplished, the system was implemented on more than 20 rigs in North America. We then adopted a soft-string T&D model to be used for various purposes including the automatic detection of overpull/underpull events and the depths where these occur, open-hole and casing friction factor determination, sensor calibration and real-time broomstick plotting and field data comparison for subsequent casing run design. In this paper, we demonstrate the field and office application and usage of a real-time T&D model. The system on which the model is run must be able to merge both real-time (hook load, torque, rig state, etc.) and contextual (BHA composition and specifications, wellbore design and trajectory, mud weight, etc.) data. Given the developed infrastructure, the drilling engineers have access to automated model calibration in real-time which enhance the reliability and repeatability of results and also contribute to time/cost savings. Using the embedded rig state identification engine, different real-time data points can be classified (e.g., slack-off, pick-up and rotating off-bottom) and used in T&D calibration. In addition to traditional broomstick plots, the algorithm uses probabilistic data analytics approaches to identify troublesome zones (e.g., overpull/underpull locations). In a fully automated manner, the platform generates predictions based on calibrated friction factors to enhance subsequent casing run as well. The outputs are used in both field and office in a variety of ways to improve drilling performance and safety. Using the developed platform, we automated the process of T&D analysis and reduced/eliminated the time/cost required to run physical models offline. Using data from multiple BHA runs and one casing run from an exemplary well in North America, we were able to demonstrate the benefits of the automated real-time application in comparison to the traditional offline use of torque and drag analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".