MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PA 03-1-0758 Implementing concussion best practice in canadian sport: the concussion protocol harmonization project

2018· article· en· W2893319657 on OpenAlexaffabout
Valerie Smith, Stephanie Cowle

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsParachute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionAthletesGuidelineBest practiceGovernment (linguistics)Resource (disambiguation)Poison controlProtocol (science)Sports medicineMedicineMedical educationPublic relationsApplied psychologyInjury preventionPsychologyPolitical scienceMedical emergencyPhysical therapyComputer scienceAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sport participation is a common cause of head injuries, especially in youth. In Canada, sport activities are the third leading cause of traumatic brain injury hospital admissions (Impact, 2013). In recent years, increasing attention on concussions has led to an increase in concussion resources, with less focus on a harmonized or standardized evidence-based information. Based on the need for a common approach to concussion recognition and management, Parachute led the development of national concussion guidelines and protocols to better equip athletes, coaches, parents, educators, and medical professionals. The purpose of the project is to improve consistency in concussion recognition and management across Canada by providing evidence-based best practice guidance and policy support to National Sport Organizations (NSOs). Using the <i>5th International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport</i> and the expertise from Canada’s leaders in concussion, Parachute created and disseminated the first-ever <i>Canadian Guideline on Concussion in Sport</i> in 2017. To increase the resource’s uptake in Canada’s sport system, Parachute worked directly with NSOs to develop updated concussion protocols and Return-to-Sport Strategies. Knowledge translations strategies included educational opportunities, practice tools, templates and resources, digital technology, traditional media, and social media. To date, more than 30 NSOs are directly applying the <i>Canadian Guideline on Concussion in Sport</i> to their concussion protocols. Project success has been attributed to: cross-sector collaboration between health and sport; government buy-in; efforts to understand the heterogenous contexts, capacities, and needs of sport organizations; and the development of audience-specific tools to improve self-efficacy for sport organizations in the field of concussion policy. The harmonization of sport-specific protocols across the country aims to positively affect the health of active Canadians by clearly defining processes for better concussions management, and ultimately reducing the long-term impact of concussions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207