MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893437402 · doi:10.1167/18.10.762

Indirect measures of visual cortex plasticity and GABA concentration are not correlated in adults with normal vision

2018· article· en· W2893437402 on OpenAlexaff
Dania Abuleil, Daphne L. McCulloch, Benjamin Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisual cortexLong-term potentiationBinocular rivalryEvoked potentialStimulationStimulus (psychology)AudiologyPsychologyNeuroscienceSynaptic plasticityPhotic StimulationVisual perceptionInternal medicineMedicinePerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Increases in visually-evoked potential (VEP) amplitude can be induced by rapid visual stimulation. This effect involves LTP mechanisms and provides an acute, objective measure of human visual cortex plasticity. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) may influence adult visual cortex plasticity. GABA concentration is inversely associated with alternation rate (AR) during binocular rivalry. Therefore, AR provides an indirect measure of GABA levels. Our aim was to test for an association between LTP and AR in young (18-40 years, n = 29) and older adults (60-80 years, n = 18). Two age groups were tested because GABA concentration changes across the lifespan. Methods Binocular rivalry was induced using orthogonal gratings viewed through anaglyphic glasses and ARs were averaged across 6 trials. LTP was assessed by comparing VEP amplitude for an onset/offset checkerboard stimulus (0.3 degree checksize, 4 degrees of visual angle) before and after 2 minutes of viewing the checkerboard presented at 9Hz. Pre and post VEPs were recorded for 3 minutes at a baseline frequency of 1Hz. Results ARs were significantly slower in older adults than young adults (t48=6.043, p< 0.001). LTP induction differed significantly between groups (F1=20.772, p< 0.001). VEP depotentiation (LTD) occurred in the young adult group (t28=3.444, p=0.002) vs. potentiation (LTP) for the older adult group (t17=-2.927, p=0.009). No correlation between AR and the change in VEP amplitude was observed for either group (p>0.05). Conclusion AR was not associated with VEP amplitude change following LTP induction. However, we did observe two unexpected effects. 1) Contrary to previous reports, visual cortex LTP could not be induced in younger adults, 2) greater LTP (higher visual cortex plasticity) occurred in the older group that had slower AR (higher visual cortex GABA concentration). Therefore, age substantially alters the response of the visual system to rivalrous stimuli and rapid visual stimulation. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207