Out-of-time ordered correlators and entanglement growth in the random-field XX spin chain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study out-of-time ordered correlations $C(x,t)$ and entanglement growth in the random-field XX model with open boundary conditions using the exact Jordan-Wigner transformation to a fermionic Hamiltonian. For any nonzero strength of the random field, this model describes an Anderson insulator. Two scenarios are considered: a global quench with the initial state corresponding to a product state of the N\'eel form, and the behavior in a typical thermal state at $\ensuremath{\beta}=1$. As a result of the presence of disorder, the information spreading as described by the out-of-time correlations stops beyond a typical length scale ${\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\text{OTOC}}$. For $|x|<{\ensuremath{\xi}}_{\text{OTOC}}$, information spreading occurs at the maximal velocity ${v}_{\mathrm{max}}=J$ and we confirm predictions for the early-time behavior of $C(x,t)\ensuremath{\sim}{t}^{2|x|}$. For the case of the quench starting from the N\'eel product state, we also study the growth of the bipartite entanglement, focusing on the late- and infinite-time behavior. The approach to a bounded entanglement is observed to be slow for the disorder strengths we study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it