<scp>LAPTM</scp>4B gene polymorphism augments the risk of cancer: Evidence from an updated meta‐analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lysosome‐associated protein transmembrane‐4 beta (LAPTM4B) has two alleles named as LAPTM4B*1 and LAPTM4B*2 (GenBank No. AY219176 and AY219177). Allele *1 has a single copy of a 19‐bp sequence in the 5` untranslated region (5`UTR), but allele *2 contains tandem repeats of 19‐bp sequence.1 LAPTM4B gene is located on long chromosome 8 (8q22.1) and contains seven exons that encodes two isoforms of tetratransmembrane proteins, LAPTM4B‐24 and LAPTM4B‐35, with molecular weights of 25 kDa and 35 kDa respectively. The LAPTM4B‐35′s primary structure is formed by 317 amino acid residues, and LAPTM4B‐24 comprised 226 amino acids. LAPTM4B, an integral membrane protein, contains several lysosomal‐targeting motifs at the C terminus and colocalizes with late endosomal and lysosomal markers. LAPTM4B is a proto‐oncogene, which becomes up‐regulated in various cancers. Preceding studies have examined the possible link between LAPTM4B polymorphism and susceptibility to several cancers,1-26 but the findings are still inconsistent. Hence, the present meta‐analysis was designed to investigate the impact of LAPTM4B polymorphism on risk of cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".