Inflammatory and JAK-STAT Pathways as Shared Molecular Targets for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis and Nephrotic Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Glomerular diseases of the kidney are presently differentiated, diagnosed and treated according to conventional clinical or structural features. While etiologically diverse, these diseases share common clinical features including but not limited to reduced glomerular filtration rate, increased serum creatinine and proteinuria suggesting shared pathogenic mechanisms across diseases. Renal biopsies from patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) or ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) were evaluated for molecular signals cutting across conventional disease categories as candidates for therapeutic targets. Methods Renal biopsies were obtained from patients with NS (minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, or membranous nephropathy) (n=187) or AAV (granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis) (n=80) from the Nep hrotic Syndrome S tu dy Net work (NEPTUNE) and the European Renal cDNA Bank. Transcriptional profiles were assessed for shared disease mechanisms. Results In the discovery cohort, 10–25% transcripts were differentially regulated versus healthy controls in both NS and AAV, >500 transcripts were shared across diseases. The majority of shared transcripts (60–77%) were validated in independent samples. Therapeutically targetable networks were identified, including inflammatory JAK-STAT signaling. STAT1 eQTLs were identified and STAT1 expression associated with GFR-based outcome. A transcriptional STAT1 activity score was generated from STAT1-regulated target genes which correlated with CXCL10 (p<0.001), a JAK-STAT biomarker, predictors of CKD progression, interstitial fibrosis (r=0.41, p<0.001), and urinary EGF (r=-0.51, p<0.001). Conclusion AAV and NS caused from histopathologically distinct disease categories share common intra-renal molecular pathways cutting across conventional disease classifications. This approach provides a starting point for de novo drug development, and repurposing efforts in rare kidney diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".