MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

RNA‐seq reveals a robust transcriptomic response during anoxia in the Western painted turtle

2013· article· en· W2893703284 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel E. Warren, Craig A. Hill, Cyriac Kandoth, Leslie T. Buck

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSaint Louis University
KeywordsTranscriptomePainted turtleBiologyGeneDownregulation and upregulationCerebrumGene expressionRNARNA-SeqFold changeMessenger RNACell biologyGeneticsEcologyEndocrinologyTurtle (robot)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Western painted turtles, Chrysemys picta bellii , can survive 3 months of anoxia at 3°C and for more than 30 hours at 20°C. Although the physiological responses to anoxia have been well studied, the underlying transcriptomic responses are not as well‐characterized. Using RNA‐seq methodology, we show a robust transcriptional response in ventricle and telencephalon to 24 hours of anoxia at 19°C, including the upregulation of several genes by more than 100‐fold, despite decreases in total RNA content of 50% and 12% in ventricle and telencephalon, respectively. qPCR validated the increased expression of several genes in ventricle, including FOS (91‐fold) and a GLUT1‐like transporter belonging to SLC2A (29‐fold). Similar validations were made in telencephalon for APOLD1 (292‐fold) and PTGS2 (219‐fold). There were no decreases in telencephalic gene expression, but there were decreases in 5 ventricular genes, including CDO1, which, when knocked out in mice, increases hydrogen sulfide levels, SRSF5, a gene involved in mRNA processing, and MKNK1, which regulates growth and differentiation. This study shows how the increased availability of sequenced genomes can provide an unprecedented level of insight into our understanding of extreme physiological adaptation and marks a transformative moment in comparative physiology. This study was funded by Saint Louis University (DEW) and NSERC (LTB) .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→