LOS INDIOS, PRÁCTICOS DE SUS PAÍSES, E INTELIGENTES DE OTRAS PLANTAS1 […]: THE INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE ACCORDING TO JOSÉ SÁNCHEZ LABRADOR S. J. ON THE BOTANY VOLUME FROM THE BOOK PARAGUAY NATURAL ILUSTRADO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article I analyze the manuscript Paraguay Natural Ilustrado, written by the Jesuit José Sánchez Labrador between 1771 and 1776, while he was exiled in Ravena, Italy. This work, located at the General Archive of the Society of Jesus (ARSI), is divided into four volumes in which we found the author’s perceptions about the American nature from the Jesuit Province of Paraguay, where he was stationed as a missionary between 1734 and 1767. This article focuses on the second volume —which deals with Botany— and exploresSánchez Labrador’s writing through the intertextuality presented in that volume, including authorities of the Natural History in the 18th century. We also want to understand the «possession» of indigenous knowledge, related to the healing practices adopted by these indigenous peoples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".