Genioglossus muscle activity during sniff and reverse sniff in healthy men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Findings What is the central question of this study? Maximal sniff nasal inspiratory and reverse sniff nasal expiratory pressures are measured as inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength, respectively. Is the genioglossus muscle activated during short maximal inspiratory and expiratory efforts through the nose? What is the main finding and its importance? Genioglossus muscle activity occurred with inspiratory muscle activity during a maximal sniff and with expiratory muscle activity during a maximal reverse sniff. These results indicate that genioglossus muscle activity is closely related to the generation of maximal sniff nasal inspiratory and reverse sniff nasal expiratory pressures. Abstract Maximal sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP max ) is widely used to assess inspiratory muscle strength. The sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is lower in patients with neuromuscular disease with bulbar involvement compared with those without, possibly owing to impaired upper airway muscle function. However, the degree to which the genioglossus (GG) muscle, one of the upper airway muscles, is activated during inspiratory and expiratory efforts through the nose remains unclear. Therefore, we examined GG activity during short and sharp inspiratory and expiratory efforts through the nose, i.e. sniff and reverse sniff manoeuvres. In eight normal young subjects, we inserted fine wire electrodes into the GG muscle, parasternal intercostal and scalene (inspiratory) muscles and transversus abdominis (expiratory) muscle. We assessed EMG activity of each muscle and measured SNIP and reverse sniff nasal expiratory pressure (RSNEP) during sniffs and reverse sniffs from low to high intensities in the sitting position. The highest SNIP and RSNEP were analysed as SNIP max and maximal RSNEP (RSNEP max ), respectively. In each subject, GG EMG activity increased linearly with increasing SNIP and RSNEP. The SNIP max and RSNEP max were −85.1 ± 15.9 and 83.2 ± 24.2 cmH 2 O, respectively. Genioglossus EMG activity varied with EMG activity of the parasternal intercostal and scalene muscles during generation of SNIP max and with EMG activity of the transversus abdominis muscle during RSNEP max . Genioglossus EMG activity during generation of SNIP max was higher than during RSNEP max (62.9 ± 31.1% EMG of SNIP max , P = 0.012). These results suggested that GG activity was closely related to the generation of both SNIP max and RSNEP max .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".