Genioglossus muscle activity during sniff and reverse sniff in healthy men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New Findings What is the central question of this study? Maximal sniff nasal inspiratory and reverse sniff nasal expiratory pressures are measured as inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength, respectively. Is the genioglossus muscle activated during short maximal inspiratory and expiratory efforts through the nose? What is the main finding and its importance? Genioglossus muscle activity occurred with inspiratory muscle activity during a maximal sniff and with expiratory muscle activity during a maximal reverse sniff. These results indicate that genioglossus muscle activity is closely related to the generation of maximal sniff nasal inspiratory and reverse sniff nasal expiratory pressures. Abstract Maximal sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIPmax) is widely used to assess inspiratory muscle strength. The sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is lower in patients with neuromuscular disease with bulbar involvement compared with those without, possibly owing to impaired upper airway muscle function. However, the degree to which the genioglossus (GG) muscle, one of the upper airway muscles, is activated during inspiratory and expiratory efforts through the nose remains unclear. Therefore, we examined GG activity during short and sharp inspiratory and expiratory efforts through the nose, i.e. sniff and reverse sniff manoeuvres. In eight normal young subjects, we inserted fine wire electrodes into the GG muscle, parasternal intercostal and scalene (inspiratory) muscles and transversus abdominis (expiratory) muscle. We assessed EMG activity of each muscle and measured SNIP and reverse sniff nasal expiratory pressure (RSNEP) during sniffs and reverse sniffs from low to high intensities in the sitting position. The highest SNIP and RSNEP were analysed as SNIPmax and maximal RSNEP (RSNEPmax), respectively. In each subject, GG EMG activity increased linearly with increasing SNIP and RSNEP. The SNIPmax and RSNEPmax were −85.1 ± 15.9 and 83.2 ± 24.2 cmH2O, respectively. Genioglossus EMG activity varied with EMG activity of the parasternal intercostal and scalene muscles during generation of SNIPmax and with EMG activity of the transversus abdominis muscle during RSNEPmax. Genioglossus EMG activity during generation of SNIPmax was higher than during RSNEPmax (62.9 ± 31.1% EMG of SNIPmax, P = 0.012). These results suggested that GG activity was closely related to the generation of both SNIPmax and RSNEPmax.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".