MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893866020 · doi:10.1111/jcmm.13905

Young bone marrow Sca‐1 cells protect aged retina from ischaemia‐reperfusion injury through activation of <scp>FGF</scp>2

2018· article· en· W2893866020 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhengbo Shao, Jie Wu, Guoqing Du, Huifang Song, Shuhong Li, Sheng He, Jiao Li, Jun Wu, Richard D. Weisel, Huiping Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRetinaStem cellBiologyBone marrowPathologyRetinalImmunologyCell biologyMedicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Retinal ganglion cell apoptosis and optic nerve degeneration are prevalent in aged patients, which may be related to the decrease in bone marrow ( BM ) stem cell number/function because of the possible cross‐talk between the two organs. This pathological process is accelerated by retinal ischaemia‐reperfusion (I/R) injury. This study investigated whether young BM stem cells can regenerate and repair the aged retina after acute I/R injury. Young BM stem cell antigen 1 positive (Sca‐1 + ) or Sca‐1 − cells were transplanted into lethally irradiated aged recipient mice to generate Sca‐1 + and Sca‐1 − chimaeras, respectively. The animals were housed for 3 months to allow the young Sca‐1 cells to repopulate in the BM of aged mice. Retinal I/R was then induced by elevation of intraocular pressure. Better preservation of visual function was found in Sca‐1 + than Sca‐1 − chimaeras 7 days after injury. More Sca‐1 + cells homed to the retina than Sca‐1 − cells and more cells differentiated into glial and microglial cells in the Sca‐1 + chimaeras. After injury, Sca‐1 + cells in the retina reduced host cellular apoptosis, which was associated with higher expression of fibroblast growth factor 2 ( FGF 2) in the Sca‐1 + chimaeras. Young Sca‐1 + cells repopulated the stem cells in the aged retina and diminished cellular apoptosis after acute I/R injury through FGF 2 and Akt signalling pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular and Molecular MedicineSame topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207