MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2893879755 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v10n10p121

A Study on Factors of the E-Purchasing Product Intention toward a Dynamic Vietnamese Internet Shopping

2018· article· en· W2893879755 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chia‐Nan Wang, Dinh-Chien Dang, Nguyễn Văn Thành

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurchasingRisk perceptionVietnameseMarketingUsabilityTechnology acceptance modelPsychologyAdvertisingProduct (mathematics)The InternetBusinessSocial psychologyPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vietnam in recently years is considered to be a country with rapid development of the e-commerce with a lot of online shopping sites e.g., Shoppee, Lazada, Tiki, and Adayroi. These sites provide a high variety of products from household devices to motorbike. However, Vietnamese people are still aware of risk in doing e-purchasing. They often go to tradition outlets to buy products. This study aims to investigate the antecedents of customers’ intentions for the case of using Internet as a new way to purchase products in Vietnam. A research model is developed relied on the integration of theory of Technology Accepted Model and Perceived risk theory to predict customer intentions to online shopping. Five factors are included in this research: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of use, Perceived Risk, Customer’s Attitude and Customer’s intention. A convenience sample of 336 respondents was collected through online and offline survey. The results of this study support that exist a positive relationship between Perceived ease of use and Perceived usefulness. Attitude, in turn is positive affected by Perceived ease of use and Perceived usefulness in which Perceived ease of use has stronger influences. While perceived risk negative impacts customers’ intention, perceived risk and Perceived usefulness, on the other hand, positive influences customers’ intention. All hypotheses are supported. It is evident that online shoppers intention are evaluated mostly based on their attitude, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207