Disparate Remodeling of the Extracellular Matrix and Proteoglycans in Failing Pediatric Versus Adult Hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common cause of heart failure in adult and pediatric patients, but the underlying mechanism may vary in adults and children, with few studies conducted to date. The objective of the present study was to determine whether differential remodeling of the extracellular matrix contributes to the differences between pediatric and adult DCM hearts. Methods and Results Explanted hearts were procured from adult (age, 46-61 years) and pediatric (age, 2-8) patients with DCM-related heart failure and nonfailing control hearts. Fibrillar and nonfibrillar extracellular matrix (proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans, glycoprotein), their regulatory enzymes (matrix metalloproteinases, disintegrin and metalloproteinases, and disintegrin and metalloproteinases with a thrombospondin domain), and their inhibitors (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases) were assessed. Pediatric DCM hearts exhibited less fibrosis compared with adult DCMs. Total glycosaminoglycans increased similarly in both DCM groups but exhibited a significantly lower affinity for transforming growth factor-β in adult DCMs versus pediatric DCMs, resulting in increased bioavailability of transforming growth factor-β1 and a significantly higher activity of the Smad2/3 pathway in adult DCMs. Glycosylated biglycan and versican, and cleaved thrombospondin-1 increased in both DCMs. Protein expression of disintegrin and metalloproteinases with thrombospondin domains (-1, -2, -4, -7) and disintegrin and metalloproteinases (-12, -15, -17, -19) were altered differently in pediatric and adult control and failing hearts. Total matrix metalloproteinase activity increased in both DCMs. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase levels were altered similarly with heart failure in both age groups, and only tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 decreased in both DCM groups. Conclusions Differential remodeling of glycosaminoglycans in pediatric DCMs versus adult DCMs could underlie the enhanced activation of the transforming growth factor-β pathway, leading to more fibrosis in adult DCM hearts. The distinct remodeling of the fibrillar and nonfibrillar extracellular matrix between pediatric and adult DCM hearts highlights a distinct pathophysiological basis for these cohorts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".