Electronic structure and intramolecular interactions in three methoxyphenol isomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electronic structures and intramolecular interactions of three methoxyphenol positional isomers and their rotamers have been studied using core X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and quantum mechanical calculations. The structural calculations are benchmarked against published calculations of enthalpy of formation and rotational constants, and published experimental data. The good agreement obtained confirms the accuracy of the results. A single rotamer of each isomer was then selected and the C 1s photoelectron spectra calculated and compared with experiment. Good agreement is obtained, and the calculations were extended to investigate the effects of conformation. For 3-methoxyphenol, the difference in the C 1s binding energy of the conformers is small, <0.15 eV. For 2-methoxyphenol, whose ground state includes an OH⋯OCH3 hydrogen bond, the higher energy rotamers show the largest shifts for the methyl carbon atom, whereas the ring carbon bonded to OH hardly shifts The theoretical differences in core level energies of the two rotamers of 4-MP are still smaller, <0.05 eV. By comparing calculations neglecting or including final state relaxation upon ionization, the relaxation energy of the phenyl carbons in all isomers is found to be ∼0.5 eV, while that of the methyl groups is ∼1.3 eV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".