A Challenging Prenatal QF-PCR Rapid Aneuploidy Test Result Caused by a Maternally Inherited Triplication within Chromosome Xq26.2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the origin of the biallelic trisomic amplification pattern of the X chromosome microsatellite marker DXS1187 in an otherwise normal male fetus, identified on routine rapid aneuploidy detection (RAD) testing by quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR). Amniocentesis was performed on a 35-year-old female at 15 weeks, 2 days gestation for a positive first trimester screen. QF-PCR, metaphase FISH, and chromosomal microarray were carried out on both maternal and fetal DNA. Fetal QF-PCR showed a biallelic trisomic pattern for the X chromosome microsatellite marker DXS1187, with an otherwise normal male amplification pattern at all other sex chromosome markers. Chromosome analysis performed on cultured amniocytes showed a normal male karyotype. Chromosome microarray analysis identified a maternally inherited 304-kb copy number triplication within chromosome Xq26.2 encompassing the DXS1187 marker. The maternally inherited X chromosome harbors an apparently tandem 304-kb triplication that overlaps the DXS1187 marker. As the triplicated region is devoid of clinically relevant genes, it was considered as likely benign in the fetus. Postnatal follow-up reported a healthy male newborn. To our knowledge, this is a unique case demonstrating a "benign" copy number imbalance involving the DXS1187 marker detected by prenatal QF-PCR RAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".