MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2894898204 · doi:10.4302/plp.v10i3.839

A study of the frequency characteristics of a photovoltaic convertor РРС-4Е

2018· article· en· W2894898204 on OpenAlexaff
Jovan Shikoski, Румен Арнаудов, Tinko Eftimov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotonics Letters of Poland · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Design and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemPhotodetectorPhotonicsOptical fiberPower (physics)Electrical engineeringElectronicsTelecommunicationsOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper considers the possibility to use the fiber-compatible photovoltaic converter РРС-4Е simultaneously as a detection photodetector for the combined transmission of photonic power and optical communication signals along a single fiber. We have studied the frequency transfer characteristics of the specialized converter РРС-4Е designed primarily for photovoltaic conversion. Full Text: PDF ReferencesPowering Remote Data Links over Fiber, www.lumentum.com, Lumentum LLC, 2015. DirectLink Basanskaya, A.: Electricity over Glass. Spectrum, IEEE, Vol. 40, No. 10, page 18, 2005. DirectLink Cohen, M.: Power-over-fibre drives remote data exchange. OPTO and Laser Europe, pages 27-29, 2006. DirectLink Yasui, T.; Ohwaki, J.; Mino, M.; Sakai, T.: A Stable 2-W Supply Optical-Powering System. 28th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, pages 1614-1617, 2000. CrossRef Werthen, J.-G.: Powering Next Generation Networks by Laser Light over Fiber. Optical Fiber communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, pages 1-3, 2008. DirectLink Iniewski K., Medical Imaging: Principles, Detectors and Electronics, p. 292, New Jersey, 2009. DirectLink Kartalopoulos, S., Optical Bit Error Rate: An Estimation Methodology (2004) Willey- IEEE Press. DirectLink Electronic Devices and Circuits: Discrete and integrated, Chapter 14 Active filters, Denton J. Daily, Prentice Hall, 2001. DirectLink

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotonics Letters of PolandSame topicLaser Design and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207