MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2895031835 · doi:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tmp45

Abstract TMP45: Predicting Long-term Body Function, Activity & Participation After Stroke: The Prevailing Role of Cognition in Determining Functional Outcome

2017· article· en· W2895031835 on OpenAlexaffabout
Arunima Kapoor, Krista L. Lanctôt, Mark Bayley, Alex Kiss, Richard H. Swartz

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCognitionStroke (engine)Depression (economics)Montreal Cognitive AssessmentObstructive sleep apneaActivities of daily livingPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCognitive impairmentPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke can impact multiple levels of function and result in complex disability. Few studies have examined limitations across the range of functions from body function to social participation, or explored the impact of post-stroke comorbidities, such as depression, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cognition, on function, especially in the long-term. We aimed to determine post-stroke predictors of multiple levels of functioning approximately 2 years after a stroke, and to specifically evaluate the impact of depressive symptoms, OSA and cognitive impairment on outcome. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that in addition to traditional predictors of outcome–age and stroke severity–depression, OSA and cognitive impairment will predict functional outcome in multiple domains. Methods: Baseline assessment of depression, apnea and cognitive impairment with 2-year follow-up assessment of functional outcome to evaluate each of the three levels of functioning as stated in the WHO International Classification of Functioning: Body Function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), Activity (modified Rankin) and Participation (Reintegration to Normal Living Index). Results: A total of 162 patients were enrolled at approximately 2 years and 5 months post-stroke. Forty one percent had activity limitations, 58% were cognitively impaired and 68% had restrictions in participation. Long-term activity limitation was predicted by greater age (OR = 0.95), stroke severity (OR = 1.69) and cognitive impairment (OR = 1.28) at baseline. Body function impairment was predicted by greater age (OR = 0.96), and cognitive impairment (OR = 1.49). Participation restriction was predicted by cognitive impairment (OR = 1.26). Conclusion: Baseline cognition predicts long-term function in multiple domains and is a better predictor of long-term participation than age or baseline stroke severity. In view of the widespread impact of post-stroke cognitive impairment on every level of functioning, routine post-stroke cognitive screening and target interventions are warranted. Greater attention to functional domains beyond activity could further optimize recovery and enhance outcome after stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→