MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895192503 · doi:10.1515/gps-2018-0092

Enhancement of molecular weight reduction of natural rubber in triphasic CO <sub>2</sub> /toluene/H <sub>2</sub> O systems with hydrogen peroxide for preparation of biobased polyurethanes

2018· article· en· W2895192503 on OpenAlexaff
Alif Duereh, Chokchai Boonchuay, Piyapong Buahom, Surat Areerat

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Processing and Synthesis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Research Council of Thailand
KeywordsTolueneOxidizing agentChemistryHydrogen peroxideNatural rubberAqueous solutionPolyurethanePolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Molecular weight reduction of natural rubber (NR) with hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) oxidizing agent is limited in biphasic water-toluene systems that is attributed to mass transfer. In this work, CO 2 was applied to the (aqueous H 2 O 2 )-(toluene-NR) systems with the objective of improving reaction efficiency. Experiments were performed on the reaction system with CO 2 at 12 MPa and at reaction temperatures and times of 60°C–80°C and 1 h–10 h to evaluate the reaction kinetics. CO 2 could enhance the NR molecular weight reduction by lowering the activation energy (from 121 kJ·mol −1 to 38 kJ·mol −1 ). The role of CO 2 in the reaction system seems to be the formation of oxidative peroxycarbonic acid intermediate and promotion of mass transport due to the reduction in the toluene-NR viscosity and interfacial tension. The epoxidized liquid NRs ( M ̅ n =4.9×10 3 g·mol −1 ) obtained from NR molecular weight reduction was further processed to prepare hydroxyl telechelic NR ( M ̅ n =1.0×10 3 g·mol −1 ) and biobased polyurethane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen Processing and SynthesisSame topicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysisFrench-language works237,207