Fluvial architecture of the Burro Canyon Formation using UAV-based photogrammetry and outcrop-based modeling: implications for reservoir performance, Rattlesnake Canyon, southwestern Piceance Basin, Colorado
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The stratigraphic variability of fluvial architectural elements and their internal lithological and petrophysical heterogeneity influence static connectivity and fluid flow. To explore the impact of fluvial architecture and facies heterogeneity on reservoir performance, well-exposed outcrops of the Cretaceous Burro Canyon Formation in Rattlesnake Canyon, Colorado, are evaluated. Analysis of the sedimentology and channel architecture of the Burro Canyon Formation provides insights into the low net- to-gross ratio, sandy, braided-fluvial style. The Burro Canyon Formation represents a South Saskatchewan type, perennial, braided fluvial system. A single depositional sequence is present in Rattlesnake Canyon containing a series of stacked amalgamated and semi-amalgamated channel complexes, composed of four architectural elements: amalgamated channel complexes, amalgamated fluvial-bar deposits, isolated fluvial-bar deposits, and floodplain fines. \nStratigraphic measured sections, outcrop gamma-ray measurements, and UAV- based (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-based) photogrammetry are used to constrain two- dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) static reservoir models of the fluvial deposits. Resulting breakthrough times (BTT) and sweep efficiency suggest subsurface performance is most effective perpendicular to paleoflow direction in amalgamated channel sequences. Perpendicular to paleoflow, BTT occurs 9% faster than parallel to the paleoflow and sweep efficiency is, on average, 16% greater. Sweep efficiency and BTT are greater perpendicular to paleoflow due to greater sandstone connectivity in this orientation. Variability of preserved channels and lateral pitchouts results in lower recovery efficiency. Reservoir heterogeneity can account for 50% variation in BTT and \nlower recovery efficiency by 5% through low petrophysical zones that trap fluids. Cemented conglomeratic facies decrease recovery efficiency by 15%, but increase sweep efficiency and BTT by 28% and 32%, respectively, creating fluid-flow barriers as conglomeratic facies fill basal scours in the Burro Canyon Formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it