MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895235004

Congenital Amusia among Young Adolescents in Kuching, Sarawak

2017· article· en· W2895235004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rachael Kar-Way Ang, Sock Siang Thia

Bibliographic record

VenueUnimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPopulationAudiologyMalayTest (biology)MusicalEthnic groupDevelopmental psychologyMedicineLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital amusia is a lifelong neurogenetic deficit characterized by the impairment of music processing. This musical disorder was commonly known as tone-deafness in the western culture. The lack of this core musical system in the human brain concerns ~4% of the general population according to a single test study from 1980. A study in 2017 based on a larger sample population, however, presents a prevalence of congenital amusia of 1.5%. The purpose of this study was aimed to investigate the occurrence of congenital amusia among young adolescents aged 13 and 14 years in Kuching, Sarawak. The results contribute new knowledge on possible musical disorder among young adolescents across different ethnicities. On the basis of a test instrument, known as the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA), and a self-assessment questionnaire, the study compared the prevalence of congenital amusia between both age groups as well as tonal language, Chinese, and non- tonal languages namely, Malay, English, Iban and Bidayuh. The impact on the types of first languages was also studied based on the aforementioned five languages. The predictors of the MBEA test scores were also established using a set of questionnaire measuring musical experience, musical habits and musical difficulties performed on a Likert scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak)Same topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207