MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895269916 · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2018.00085

Editorial: The Role of AAA+ Proteins in Protein Repair and Degradation

2018· editorial· en· W2895269916 on OpenAlexafffund
James Shorter, Walid A. Houry

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Molecular Biosciences · 2018
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsProtein foldingProtein degradationDegradation (telecommunications)Protein stabilityPosttranslational modificationFolding (DSP implementation)ChemistryComputational biologyBiophysicsCell biologyBiologyComputer scienceBiochemistryEngineeringEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ATPases Associated with diverse cellular Activities (AAA+) comprise a superfamily of proteins that perform a large variety of functions essential to cell physiology, including control of protein homeostasis, DNA replication, recombination, chromatin remodeling, ribosomal RNA processing, molecular targeting, organelle biogenesis, and membrane fusion Members of this superfamily are defined by the presence of what is termed the AAA+ domain containing the canonical Walker A and B motifs required for ATP binding and hydrolysis Typically, genomes encode approximately ten to several hundred AAA+ family members (Table The striking adaptive radiation of AAA+ proteins to operate in diverse settings illustrates the versatile utility of the AAA+ domain AAA+ proteins typically form hexameric complexes and act as motors to remodel other proteins, DNA/RNA, or multicomponent complexes (Figure Indeed, many chaperones and ATP-dependent proteases are or have subunits that belong to this superfamily (Figure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Molecular BiosciencesSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207