Joint 2-D–3-D Traffic Sign Landmark Data Set for Geo-Localization Using Mobile Laser Scanning Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a framework to build a joint 2-D-3-D traffic sign landmark data set for geo-localization using mobile laser scanning (MLS) data. The MLS data include 3-D point clouds and corresponding multi-view images. First, an integrated method, based on a deep learning network and the retro-reflective properties of traffic signs, is developed to accurately extract traffic signs from MLS point clouds. Next, the semantic and spatial properties of the traffic signs (type, location, position, and geometric characteristics) are obtained. Then, a joint 2-D-3-D traffic sign landmark data set is built, and a semantic-spatial organization graph is used to organize the traffic sign data set. Last, based on the traffic sign landmark data set, a geo-localization method for a driving car is proposed to estimate the driving trajectory. It can be used for auxiliary positioning of autonomous vehicles. Experimental results demonstrate the reliability of our proposed method for traffic sign detection and the potential of building 2-D-3-D traffic sign landmark data set for driving trajectory estimation from MLS data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".