An alternative processing pathway of APP reveals two distinct cleavage modes for rhomboid protease RHBDL4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the first genetic description of a rhomboid in Drosophila melanogaster, tremendous efforts have been geared towards elucidating the proteolytic mechanism of this particular class of intramembrane proteases. In particular, mammalian rhomboid proteases sparked our interest and we aimed to investigate the human homologue RHBDL4. In light of our recent finding of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) family as efficient substrates of RHBDL4, we were enticed to further study the specific proteolytic mechanism of this enzyme by comparing cleavage patterns of wild type APP and APP TMS chimeras. Here, we demonstrate that the introduction of positively charged amino acid residues in the TMS redirects the RHBDL4-mediated cleavage of APP from its ectodomain closer towards the TMS, possibly inducing an ER-associated degradation (ERAD) of the substrate. In addition, we concluded that the cytoplasmic tail and proposed palmitoylation sites in the ectodomain of APP are not essential for the RHBDL4-mediated APP processing. In summary, our previously identified APP ectodomain cleavages by RHBDL4 are a subsidiary mechanism to the proposed RHBDL4-mediated ERAD of substrates likely through a single cleavage near or within the TMS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".