Therapeutic difficulties in management of the patient with anorexia nervosa and comorbid borderline personality disorder – case study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: This case report addresses some clinical challenges occurring throughout the therapeutic process of specialized management treatment of Anorexia Nervosa with comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder. Materials and method: Clinical examinations and measures – Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-II), Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) have been employed to identify the nature and severity of patient’s psychopathology and its potential change throughout the therapeutic process. Results: Despite some improvement in the symptoms of the eating disorder following the treatment, some other measures of psychopathology (e.g., depression) remained at similar level. Conclusions: Only partial improvement in the profile of F.C.’s psychopathology was observed. Discussion: Management of AN with comorbid BPD requires a comprehensive care package including integrative psychotherapy, nutritional interventions and pharmacotherapy at an inpatient setting as well as follow-up care thereafter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".