The Benefits of Temu Mangga (Curcuma Mangga Val) in Cognitive Functions of Elderly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of Temu Mangga extract (Curcuma Mangga Val) with cognitive function test using Montreal Cognitive Assesment- Indonesian version (MoCA-Ina -Registry MoCA-Ina / stroke registry-INA 2012) in Elderly. This Clinical trial study was conducted using a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, pre and post-test group design in 85 female participants from Panti Wreda Nursing Home in Jakarta. A total of 83 participants who followed the study to the end. 43 participants were administered the Temu Mangga Capsule (TM) group 3x500 mg/day for 30 days. Results: Mean score of MoCA-Ina in TM group increased by 2.37 from 23.93 ± 3.73 to 26.30 ± 3.92 with Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.000, and in the control group with 40 participants increased by 2.55 from 23.58 ± 4.60 to 26.13 ± 4.56 with Wilcoxon test p-value = 0.000. Mann-Whitney test results in both groups p > 0.05. Conclusions: There was an increase in each treatment groups and control groups with significant Moca-Ina values, but between the two groups did not show significant difference changes. Psychological factors such as attention and hope will become healthier are a strong factor in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".