MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2895689459 · doi:10.5194/bg-2018-403

Distribution, seasonality, optical characteristics, and fluxes of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the Pearl River (Zhujiang) estuary, China

2018· article· en· W2895689459 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Li, Guisheng Song, Philippe Massicotte, Fangming Yang, Ruihuan Li, Huixiang Xie

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsCégep de RimouskiUniversité du Québec à RimouskiUniversité LavalBio-K+ International (Canada)
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Tianjin CityTianjin UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsColored dissolved organic matterEstuaryDissolved organic carbonSeasonalitySalinityEnvironmental sciencePearlEnvironmental chemistrySurface waterChemistryOceanographyEcologyBiologyGeologyGeographyPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Dissolved organic carbon concentration in the Pearl River estuary (PRE) of China was measured in May, August, and October 2015 and January 2016. Chromophoric and fluorescent dissolved organic matter (CDOM and FDOM) in the latter three seasons were characterized by absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. Parallel factor analysis of the fluorescence spectra identified two protein-like, two humic-like, and one oxidized quinone-like FDOM components. The seasonality of average DOM abundance varied as follows: DOC: May (156 μmol L−1) > January (114 μmol L−1) ≈ August (112 μmol L−1) > November (86 μmol L−1); CDOM absorption at 330 nm: August (1.76 m−1) > November (1.39 m−1) ≈ January (1.30 m−1); FDOM expressed as the sum of the maximum fluorescence intensities of all FDOM components: November (1.77 R.U.) > August (1.54 R.U.) ≈ January (1.49 R.U.). Average DOM abundance in surface water was higher than in bottom water, their difference being marginal (0.1–10 %) for DOC in all seasons and for CDOM and FDOM in November and January, and moderate (16–21 %) for CDOM and FDOM in August. DOC showed little cross-estuary variations in all seasons while CDOM and FDOM in January were higher on the west side of the estuary than in the middle and on the east side. All three variables exhibited large variations and/or rapid drawdowns at the head of the estuary (salinity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→