MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895818457 · doi:10.3389/feart.2018.00155

Crystal Chemistry of Three Volcanic K-rich Nepheline Samples From Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania and Mount Nyiragongo, Eastern Congo, Africa

2018· article· en· W2895818457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Earth Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersBasic Energy SciencesArgonne National LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNephelineElectron microprobeGeologyMineralogyCrystallographyFormula unitCrystal structureAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural nepheline (Nph) samples are intermediate members of solid solutions that extend from the pure Na end-member Na[AlSiO4] to the pure K end-member K[AlSiO4] (= kalsilite, Kls). We examined two volcanic nepheline (ideally, K2Na6[Al8Si8O32] or Nph0.75Kls0.25) samples from Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania (samples 1 and 2) and a third sample 3 from Mount Nyiragongo, Eastern Congo. The crystal structure of these three samples was obtained using synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD) data and Rietveld structure refinements in space group P63. Satellite reflections were not observed in these samples. The EPMA composition of sample 1 is {K1.50Na0.19Ca0.070.23}Σ2(Na)6[Si8.35Al7.48Fe0.18]Σ16.00O32. The A site contains 0.23 vacancies () with some Na and Ca atoms, whereas the B site is completely filled with only Na atoms. From the EPMA formula, K(sof) = 0.844 and Na(sof) = 1.0. The refinement unit-cell parameters are a = 10.00247(1), c = 8.38396(1) Å, V = 726.431(1) Å3; K(sof) = 0.779(2) and Na(sof) = 0.988(2). The composition of sample 2 is {K1.670.33}Σ2(Na5.76K0.174Ca0.06)Σ6[Si8.44Al7.37Fe0.20]Σ16.01O32, so K(sof) = 0.835 and Na(sof) = 1.030. Sample 2 has a = 10.01769(2), c = 8.39586(2) Å, V = 729.678(1) Å3, K(sof) = 0.812(2), and Na(sof) = 0.995(2). Sample 3 is a three-phase (3a, 3b, 3c) intergrowth with an average formula of {K1.770.23}2(Na4.30K1.51Ca0.19)Σ6[Si8.13Al7.76Fe0.11]Σ16.00O32, K(sof) = 0.887, and Na(sof) = 1.208. A large amount of K and Ca atoms occur in the B site. Based on the weight percentages and sofs of the three phases, the Rietveld refinement gives an average K(sof) = 0.859 and Na(sof) = 1.145. The average distances indicate a high degree of Al-Si disorder in samples 1, 2, and phase 3b. These African samples extend natural nepheline solid solutions to about Nph0.55Kls0.45. The average distance increases linearly with Na(sof) and V across nepheline solid solutions because K atoms enter the Na site. K-rich nepheline seems to always contain vacancies in the A site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it