Free vibration of size and temperature‐dependent carbon nanotube (CNT)‐reinforced composite nanoplates with CNT agglomeration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Free vibration analysis of size‐dependent carbon nanotube‐reinforced composite (CNTRC) nanoplates, resting on the visco‐Pasternak foundation is studied. The Mori–Tanaka approach, considering carbon nanotube (CNT) agglomeration, is employed to derive the material properties of the composite nanoplates. The analysis is carried out for the uniform distribution (UD) and randomly oriented (RO) distribution of single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) while the nanoplate and the foundation are considered to be temperature‐dependent. Using Hamilton's principle, the governing differential equations are derived based on the Eringen's nonlocal elasticity theory and sinusoidal shear deformation theory (SSDT). The natural frequency of the nanoplates is then obtained by the Navier's analytical solution. To verify the method presented, the results are compared with those in the literature. Detailed parametric studies are performed to discuss the influences of CNTs agglomeration, nonlocal parameter, temperature, foundation parameters, the volume fraction of CNTs, plate length‐to‐thickness, and aspect ratios on the free vibration of the CNTRC nanoplates. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:E1479–E1494, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it