Increased pain sensitivity and decreased opioid analgesia in T-cell-deficient mice and implications for sex differences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The processing of pain in the central nervous system is now known to have an important immune component, including T cells of the adaptive immune system. T cells have been shown to release endogenous opioids, and although it is well known that opioids have effects on T-cell populations, very little attention has been given to the converse: how T cells may affect opioid regulation. We find here that, in addition to displaying significantly increased baseline pain sensitivity across various pain modalities, T-cell-deficient mice (CD-1 nude, Rag1 null mutant, and Cd4 null mutant) exhibit pronounced deficiencies in morphine inhibition of thermal or inflammatory pain. Nude mice are also deficient in endogenous opioid-mediated analgesia, exhibiting no stress-induced analgesia from restraint. The relevant T-cell subpopulation seems to be CD4 T cells because adoptive transfer of them but not CD8 cells into nude mice rescues both the pain and morphine analgesia phenotypes. As previously reported, we also observe a sex difference in CD-1 mice, with females requiring 2- to 3-fold more morphine than males to produce equal analgesia. Nude mice display no sex differences in morphine analgesia, and the sex difference is restored in nude mice of either sex receiving CD4 T cells from CD-1 donor male or female mice. These results suggest that CD4 T cells play an as yet unappreciated role in opioid analgesia and may be a driver of sex differences therein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".