MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2895911768 · doi:10.1121/1.5067970

Incorporating real-time acoustic ranging and glider-based Doppler measurements to aid vehicle navigation

2018· article· en· W2895911768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah E. Webster, Lora J. Van Uffelen, Andrey Shcherbina, Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, Craig M. Lee, Peter F. Worcester, Matthew A. Dzieciuch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliderUnderwater gliderDoppler effectAcoustic Doppler current profilerRangingGeologyAcousticsRange (aeronautics)Remote sensingGeodesyCurrent (fluid)Marine engineeringPhysicsOceanographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the summer of 2017, two Seagliders equipped with low frequency acoustic recorders and 1 MHz acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) were deployed in the Canada Basin as part of a large-scale acoustic tomography experiment. Acoustic tomography sources were moored at approximately 175 m depth within an acoustic duct enabling acoustic transmission to be received at long ranges. The sources transmitted at a center frequency of approximately 250 Hz every four hours, and ranges between the sources and Seaglider were estimated in real time using a WHOI MicroModem. These ranges can be incorporated into an extended Kalman filter for navigation. In addition, glider-mounted upward-looking ADCPs recorded ~26.5 m shear profiles every 15 seconds. These overlapping profiles can be used to estimate (in post-processing) both the local current profile on a per-dive basis and the glider's relative velocity through the water. In real time, the close-range ADCP velocity measurements can be used to estimate the glider's relative (Through The Water, TTW) velocity to improve the glider's subsea position estimate. We will describe our recent developments in using these Doppler measurements to aid glider navigation, comparing the results to previous developments in range-aided navigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicUnderwater Acoustics Research→French-language works237,207→